June 2nd, 2004

 

Federal Aviation Administration
Mr. Clay Hewitt
Regional Runway Safety Program Manager
1601 Lind Ave. SW
Renton, WA 98055

RE: Runway & Aircraft Safety Issues Concerning Notams

Dear Mr. Hewitt:

The Colorado Airport Operators Association (CAOA) Notam Committee met with Ms. Lisa Rounsavell of the Denver AFSS on May 13th, 2004, followed by a presentation she made to the members of our association during our Spring 2004 Conference in Grand Junction. As noted during our committee’s discussion, a number of Colorado airports have been having a variety of problems concerning Notam issuance, processing and dissemination. These include but are not limited to:

  1. Inconsistencies with acceptance of Notam information by AFSS controllers. On a regular basis, some controllers will not accept both routine and non-routine Notam information issued by Colorado airports, while other controllers will. Additionally, information is sometimes accepted by the AFSS, only for the airport to receive a phone call later in the day by the AFSS advising them that the Notam cannot be issued.
     
  2. Inflexible nature of the Notam system concerning airport operational safety issues. As discussed in detail during the committee meeting, most airports are required under their Airport Certification Manuals, through FAA airspace reviews, or through their FAA approved construction safety and phasing plans, to issue Notams on many circumstances which are not considered Notam criteria by AFSS guidelines. This problem has been caused by conflicting requirements between different branches or divisions of the FAA, which have placed airports in a difficult position concerning being able to meet their reporting requirements. Additionally, the current Notam criteria does not allow for any flexibility whatsoever for an airport to issue a Notam on an obvious airport operational safety issue which pilots need to know about, if it is not considered Notam criteria under the current guidelines. 

    The differing Notam opinions by two different lines of business within the FAA is of significant issue. The varying Notam requirements of each line of business that airports must work with must be made consistent in order not to continue causing the degradation of both runway and aircraft operational safety which currently exists.
     
  3. Speed of processing Notams by AFSS. A common problem for most Colorado airports is the time it normally takes to process a Notam and have it entered into the system at the AFSS level. For example, during periods of inclement weather, when airports are conducting snow removal operations, critical safety information on airport operational areas tends to change often, requiring updates to Notams frequently throughout the day. Notams on current field conditions are often being issued to the AFSS before the prior field condition Notams have even been processed into the Notam system by AFSS. It was reported by several airports at the committee meeting that pilots are often phoning the airport’s while in flight to obtain the most current field condition information before landing, since Notam information obtained from AFSS is often obsolete.

    One solution discussed by our committee was the possibility of using existing wireless technology to transmit Notams to the AFSS directly from the field. Using a standardized Notam template to reduce terminology or contraction errors, palm pilot type devices can be used to transmit the most up to date Notam information to the AFSS, provided the AFSS is equipped with a receiving device. The Colorado Airport Operators Association is willing to pursue potential funding for such a system, including the receiving equipment needed in the Denver AFSS, provided this program meets with the FAA’s approval.

In each of the above circumstances and examples, pilot safety and runway safety are being jeopardized. This exposes our airports to additional liability, despite efforts to notify pilots of current or hazardous conditions.

CAOA understands the substantial role that AFSS controllers play in the operational safety of the Colorado Airport System, and recognizes the sometimes overwhelming effort they invest in a system with greatly limited resources. However, we also feel that the Federal Aviation Administration needs to evaluate how these limited resources and the inflexible nature of the system are affecting the dissemination of critical flight safety information to pilots, and the potential results these are having on the aviation system. While our committee will continue to meet and communicate with AFSS personnel regularly on these and other issues, we urge the FAA to consider making policy changes within its system which will improve the overall safety and efficiency of the Colorado, and the National Airspace System.

Sincerely,

 

Rex Tippetts, A.A.E.

President

Copyright © 2008 Colorado Airport Operators Association